Les oligarques BRUXELLES HATE ITALIE ET ​​italo ': voici les lois et règlements contre nous (MERITE Smacked)

La dernière surprise - écrit le journal en kiosque dès aujourd'hui - et «que, à partir de ce mois, l'Union européenne a demandé à l'Italie d'accroître sa contribution aux comptes avec € 340 000 000 chaque année à ajouter au compte à partir de 17 milliards. L'avant-dernier et «que le règlement en vigueur depuis Décembre 1169, a éliminé l'obligation d'indiquer sur les denrées alimentaires pour l'usine de traitement. Joli coup! (Façon de parler)
Déplacements faux, nourriture sans un certificat d'origine, produits de mauvaise qualité et toxique importée du Tiers-Monde à prix d'aubaine: la liste des anti-italien et approuvé par Bruxelles infinie. Les mesures qui se moquent de nos excellents produits et que leurs genoux notre économie.
Tout comme le même temps, l'UE jeter l'argent par la fenêtre pour les cours d'éducation sexuelle au Burundi et l'économie verte en Egypte.
Sur le plan alimentaire et 'arrivé "encore un autre coup dur pour nos producteurs qui seront tués par les multinationales et les importateurs qui peuvent facilement passer pour le lait, la viande et les huiles de chissadove et faits chissacome. Pour ne pas dire Made in Italy, une marque qui vaut la peine 1300000000000 dollars et que l'UE insiste pour ne pas vouloir reconnaître. Faire, cependant, de plus en plus «coûteux pour les entreprises de continuer à investir en Europe. L'UE est devenue une immense prison avec des tortionnaires à Bruxelles qui détestent la 'Italie.
. Pendant ce temps, "en attendant de se lancer dans le grand train en marche, seulement pour la Turquie en 2013 pour 935 millions d'euros ont été alloués donc nombreux et bien camouflé dans le langage bureaucratique dont l'UE et« enseignant: cette fois la voix Ipa, Support Tool Pré-adhésion qui sont généreusement financés pays prêché à entrer dans l'Union.
Et ils vont à la Turquie, mais aussi en Serbie, en attendant de devenir membre, recueille, à nouveau en 2013, environ 214 millions d'euros. Alors que 118 sont ceux suis allé en Bosnie-Herzégovine et encore 118 agrafés ceux de la Croatie. Un bon apéritif avant de se asseoir all'eurobanchetto qui dînait dans un grand nombre. Non Italie que dans un budget de 140 milliards de la troisième contributeur après l'Allemagne et la France, bien que le classement du PIB par habitant nous place à la douzième place.
Et sont les 5,7 milliards que, en 2012 nous avons payé plus »que reçu. Contraignants pour les producteurs italiens Le fait que la Commission européenne a remplacé les gouvernements nationaux à l'OMC, l'organisation qui supervise les accords commerciaux. Voici l'un des pics et 'outil généralisé préférentiel, par lequel les pays en développement exportent leurs produits aux conditions Octroi plus «favorable. Le résultat «que le riz du Cambodge et le Myanmar est en train de tuer les producteurs italiens.
Cosi 'tels que les textiles en provenance du Pakistan et pour le poisson (surtout le thon) des Philippines. Parce que pour nos entreprises et «impossible de rivaliser avec ceux qui utilisent le travail des enfants, peut« polluer et poissons librement sans respect des normes internationales.
Lethal, en particulier pour les producteurs dell'ortofrutta en Italie du Sud, et «également l'accord de libre-échange avec le Maroc qui coupe les tarifs d'importation. Un Caporetto également le chapitre du Made in Italy, dont Bruxelles continue d'empêcher la protection, la définition d'un «obstacle au commerce» de la demande pour nos parlementaires d'imposer des règles claires d'origine des produits. Règles, cependant, sont adoptées aux États-Unis, Canada, Japon, et même en Inde et en Chine. Et si «la contrefaçon seulement en Italie tue 110 000 emplois, avec une perte avant impôts de € 1,7 milliards.
Mais pour Coldiretti, les données pour la nourriture sont encore plus «dramatique:« causer de la nourriture de la falsification nous fait perdre € 60000000000, avec un coût social effrayant de 300 000 emplois. Avec la faiblesse de l'Europe qui devient une entreprise pour la facture aujourd'hui de agromafie € 12,5 milliards par an. Le coupable? En 2012, 64 pour cent des produits contrefaits entrant dans l'UE proviennent de la Chine.
Et les données de l'anarchie »sont à la hausse, étant donné l'incapacité» (ou pas vouloir ') de la Commission européenne d'introduire des règles protégeant la production authentique et le thème des «indications géographiques» et «ignorés. Et la même chose semble se produire avec le TTIP, le partenariat transatlantique pour le commerce et l'investissement: un accord commercial de libre-échange entre l'UE et les Etats-Unis qui pénalisent une fois de plus nos producteurs, la réduction des tarifs et la suppression dans de nombreux domaines les barrières non tarifaires qui limiteraient les importations.
Pour défendre que la sécurité de l'environnement ou à la santé, à moins que nos agriculteurs et entrepreneurs.
Puis il ya toutes ces règles communautaires qui encouragent les entreprises à changer le pays conditions courir plus «favorable. Avec les abus et la concurrence déloyale par le détachement des travailleurs et la libre circulation des professionnels. De plus en plus «délocalisation fréquente des fausses entreprises qui mauvaise licencier du personnel à embaucher des travailleurs étrangers pas cher, couverts par des protections contractuelles très mineurs et dont les charges sont facilement contourné contribution.
Avec la moquerie que, souvent, les entreprises italiennes sont corrects alors aussi obligés de compenser les pertes des caisses contributions générées par des violations des autres. Et l'UE a neutralisé par la fraude de contrôle Inspection du travail. Maintenant, il ya 'la directive également 1307/2013 nouvelle politique agricole commune (PAC) avec laquelle les agriculteurs italiens pour «niveler les quantités avec d'autres pays", laissez le champ (et «le cas de le dire) pour la 7 pour cent des contributions ".
Ayant dit tout cela - la preuve de tout refus - question se pose naturellement: que faisons-nous dans l'UE? Pour nous voler et le massacre par les oligarchies de Bruxelles qui nous méprisent?
Il suffit de sortir et a claqué la porte.

Putin, the ruble and the 'hoax' Russia's knee: The collapse is a bargain

Following the media, Russia is apparently about to experience a major crisis in a position to put the domestic economy to its knees. It 's true?

The answer is no, and is obtained by applying elementary economic dynamics completely divorced from the political will that would paint a different situation. We see the 'against' amplified by the media to explain then, with the greatest possible clarity, because those 'against' are, instead of the 'pro' for Russia.

The 'AGAINST'. In order to support the devaluation of the ruble, the Central Bank of Russia is burning its reserves. The amount of the reserves until now consumed to support the ruble is about $ 100 billion out of a total of about 450 billion available. 50% of tax revenues in Russia comes from the energy sector, strategic sector for Russia. Some operators are exposed signaling that Russia would need a rate of about $ 110 a barrel to break even the budget of 2015. The collapse of oil prices "would be" a problem for Russia because it causes a contraction of the domestic economy .

The 'PRO'. The ruble devalued just to compensate for the collapse of oil (Russia being a major manufacturer is rather unlikely that they were not ready for such an eventuality).

The procedure is as follows: Russia is an oil-producing country and derived from its sale nearly 50% of government revenues, for every dollar received in less exports of crude oil, now derives a greater amount of ruble, due to the depreciation . Let's take an example to make the concept clear.

In June, when the price was at its maximum ($ 115 a barrel), a dollar is still traded against 34.40 rubles. The calculation is simple: for every barrel of oil exported, Russia incassava 3,700 rubles. With the collapse in prices of around $ 65 per barrel, and with a change that sees a dollar worth 57 rubles, Russia continues to collect exactly the same amount of rubles of six months ago, when the oil market was booming.

The confirmation of what we write is mathematics. In November (included) in 2014, the Russian state budget recorded a fiscal surplus of 1.27 trillion rubles ($ 23 billion). Compared with the same period last year when the surplus was 600 billion rubles in 2012 was 798 billion rubles, and in 2011 was 1.34 trillion rubles.

It 'clear that the collapse of the ruble is a bargain for the Russian government, which erased (this does not tell anyone) 24 weekly auctions this year, thanks to the fact that the performance of public accounts has allowed him to avoid refinance stellar rates imposed by the market.

Obviously, there is to report some problems, we find it at the bottom scraping the "barrel". A something had to appeal misinformation. Inflation tends to double digits, must necessarily be opposed by the Russian Central Bank, the procedure to compress inflation in Economics is to make a monetary tightening. Monetary tightening is an operation performed by a central bank aimed at reducing the supply of money circulating in the economy. The instrument is used to make an increase in the discount rate, and will have the effect of sending the Russian economy in "mild" recession in 2015.

At this point it is understandable the objection of those who want us to believe that the recession is not a good thing. Of course it's not, but objectively speaking comforted by the Economic Science, can not release the objector (intellectually correct) from considering that we are talking about a country in the "war" with the West, which apparently has already accepted the price a temporary economic crisis. The Russian Central Bank is only preserving the public finances, there is no catastrophe Russian, with all due respect to those who wait "blindly" to the contrary.

Financial education: only weapon of survival

Prova un nuovo browser con traduzione automatica.Scarica Google ChromeIgnora

Traduttore

Financial education: only weapon of survival

"An ignorant people do not reason, obeys." To this basic ignorance, induced, it also adds the weapon of "mass distraction" in a war that winds and of which we are more and more victims.
"An ignorant people do not reason, obeys." Word of Francesco De Sanctis. It was 1860 and Italy was at the dawn of its controversial existence. Today, 150 years later, the policy has yet easy game, out of a population that besides being deliberately kept in ignorance (with cuts to the school and without any competitive offer from teaching methods arrears in both the teaching staff in the very structures) is also stressed the most pressing problems and currently present.
The fusion of the disciplines

Humanists are the last aristocratic culture and the sublime pleasure that allows you to appreciate a hexameter Homer is undoubtedly invaluable, but we all live in a world that is governed by the finance and finance ignores the Greek meter as well as the beauty of 'oratory of Cicero or the construct Tacitus. But paradoxically, as the only gift is just the classical culture to warn us that Mother Logic can come to our rescue and makes us understand how the first weapon to sharpen both knowledge of the language spoken by the "enemy". Yes, the enemy, because civil society, today, without even knowing it, is in fact in the middle of a war. Fought well with other weapons, most notably that of "mass distraction" that welcomes provide myriad input useless tidbits seasoned easy sensationalism, or a subculture also imposed on banks of the school, in a dilapidated structure (budget cuts ) in turn run by professors equally resigned to a career often precarious, without stimuli or the other opposite, lying lazily in the certainties of a permanent contract. For those who have.
War, it was said. Parallelism too simple if you think that our economy, with its numbers can easily be compared to that of the Second World War on the consumer side: every day in many in Europe are forced to make ends meet making choices increasingly selective, dictated by a crisis that continues to persist, so much so that 80% of women to return to the value of the self-made, English-speaking term that could easily be translated with the classic homemade ".
Return to the wisdom of DIY

Food especially, also benefit health in some cases, but also clothes, thanks to the knowledge capacity maybe learn from a grandmother (luckily Italy has a population particularly long-lived and wisdom is always a bastion safe during storms, of all kinds), but also the discovery of the Internet as a place to exchange tips, create purchasing groups, have the possibility of barter, recycle or exploit ideas for recycling. A war with the work, to find it, to keep it, to be able to understand why there is not, but above all to understand why we are asking sacrifices people, politicians, who often do not have to sacrifice ever made. And is bitterly mocking the scene starring this "sacrifice" the unemployed in their early twenties who have no salary, much less no subsidies, just fired their fifties, too young to retire, too old for a new hire, but with a lot of family dependents and mortgage to close. A people who, as said earlier, often bears too. The reasons? So many, so many will not even be found more in one quadrant.

Ignorance financial
Everything could be one of the financial ignorance: according to a recent OECD study that involved 18 nations, Italy was second last for the knowledge of the subject. No wonder, then, that today no one be offended if he reads the news of an exposure to derivatives by Deutsche Bank amounting to 75 trillion dollars virtually the same amount of global GDP and 5 times that of Europe, or that in the US the major 5 the banks are for 40 trillion. Maybe because we ourselves are not even accustomed to thinking in trillions, or because, quite rightly, concerned about many other emergencies daily, with a slalom between taxes and tax deadlines that by the next day will bring into the coffers of the state 44 billion. How many of these will then be returned as services to citizens? And how, instead used to plug the hole from potential exposure to derivatives in June saw those on the public debt of the Italian Republic with a deficit of 34.4 billion euro? In the real possibility of not being able to honor our, deadlines, we find hardly desire to understand those of the Italian state. As well as to go and look up the meaning and dynamics that govern a derivative. Financial education and economic latita is a serious handicap.

The hidden benefits in daily life
Have it would be useful not only to understand what is really happening to the nation, what often unknown even to the politicians in office, but also for the understanding of reality and especially to be able to offer an alternative to the system. Easy to complain, propose plans reasoned, however, is very different. Financial education that would also be useful to be aware of our possibilities: extricate the financial jargon to understand the voices of your bank statement and find out the hidden costs imposed (and silenced) by banks, understand that the TAN (pure interest rate applied to a financing) or the APR (the indicator of interest rate financing operation) at the bottom of a loan within the customary range, improve the ability of criticism at the time of purchase, because every time you put your wallet at the supermarket, or you change even the rate of the telephone bill, it means that it has concluded a contract, or an exchange of goods / offer / rate, which has been taken note of and which are accepted as the intrinsic characteristics also the price. And perhaps avoiding some little surprise at the end of the month ...
"The quality of education given to the lower classes must be the poor and mediocre as possible so that the distance of ignorance that plans among the lower classes and upper classes is and remains impossible to fill the lower classes." This recently wrote Noam Chomsky, without being wrong.

The Rise of German Imperialism and the Phony “Russian Threat”

By Prof. James Petras

The principle Nazi ideological prop that secured massive financial and political support from Germany’s leading industrialists was the Communist and Soviet threat.  The main Nazi military drive, absorbing two-thirds of its best troops, was directed eastward at conquering and destroying Russia.  The ‘Russian Threat’ justified Nazi Germany’s conquest and occupation of the Ukraine, the Balkans, Eastern Europe and the Baltic states, with the aid of a substantial proportion of local Nazi collaborators.
After Germany’s defeat , division  and  disarmament, and with the extension of Soviet power,  the US reinstated the Nazi industrial and banking giants, officials and intelligence operatives. At first they were engaged in rebuilding their domestic economy and consolidating political power, in collaboration with the US military occupation forces.
By the late 1960’s Germany regained economic primacy in Europe and was at the forefront of European ‘integration’, in association with France and England. It soon came to dominate the principle decision – making institutions of the European Union(EU). The EU served as Germany’s instrument for conquest by stealth. Year by year, through ‘aid’ and low interest loans,the EU  facilitated German capitalist’s  market penetration and financial expansion,through out south and central Europe. Germany set the agenda for Western Europe, gaining economic dominance while benefiting from US subversion and encirclement of Eastern Europe, Russia and the Baltic and Balkan states.
Germany’s Great Leap Forward:  The Annexation of East Germany and the Demise of the USSR
Germany’s projection of power on a world scale would never have occurred if it had not annexed East Germany.  Despite the West German claims of beneficence and ‘aid’ to the East, the Bonn regime secured several million skilled engineers, workers and technicians, the takeover of factories, productive farms and, most important, the Eastern European and Russian markets for industrial goods, worth  billions of dollars.  Germany was transformed from an emerging influential EU partner, into the most dynamic expansionist power in Europe, especially in the former Warsaw Pact economies.
The annexation of East Germany and the overthrow of the Communist governments in the East allowed German capitalists to dominate markets in the former  Eastern bloc .As the major trading partner,  it seized control of major industrial enterprises via corrupt privatizations decreed  by the newly installed pro-capitalist client regimes.  As the Czech Republic, Poland, Slovakia, Hungary, Bulgarian, the Baltic States “privatized” and “de-nationalized” strategic economic, trade, media and social service sectors, ‘unified’ Germany was able to resume a privileged place.  As Russia fell into the hands of gangsters, emerging oligarchs and political proxies of western capitalists, its entire industrial infrastructure was decimated and Russia was converted into a giant raw-material export region.
Germany converted its trade relations with Russia from one between equals into a ‘colonial’ pattern:  Germany exported high value industrial products and imported gas, oil and raw materials from Russia.
German power expanded exponentially, with the annexation of the “other Germany”, the restoration of capitalism in Eastern Europe and the ascendancy of client regimes eager and willing to submit to a German dominated European Union and a US directed NATO military command.
German political-economic expansion via ‘popular uprisings’, controlled by local political clients, was soon accompanied by a US led military offensive – sparked by separatist movements.  Germany intervened in Yugoslavia, aiding and abetting separatists in Slovenia and Croatia .It backed the US-NATO bombing of Serbia and supported the far-right, self-styled Kosovo Liberation Army ( KLA),engaged in a terrorist war in  Kosovo .  Belgrade was defeated and regime change led to a neo-liberal client state.  The US built the largest military base in Europe in Kosovo. Montenegro and Macedonia became EU satellites.
While NATO expanded and enhanced the US military presence up to Russia’s borders, Germany became the continent’s pre-eminent economic power.
Germany and the New World Order
While President Bush and Clinton were heralding a “new world order”, based on  unipolar military supremacy, Germany advanced its new imperial order by exercising its  political and economic levers.  Each of the two power centers, Germany and the US, shared the common quest of rapidly incorporating the new capitalist regimes into their regional organizations –the European Union (EU) and NATO– and extending their reach globally.  Given the reactionary origins and trajectory into vassalage of the Eastern, Baltic and Balkan regimes, and given their political fears of a popular reaction to the loss of employment, welfare and independence resulting from their implementation of savage neoliberal “shock policies”, the client rulers immediately “applied” for membership as subordinate members of the EU and NATO, trading sovereignty, markets and national ownership of the means of production for economic handouts and the ‘free’ movement of labor, an escape valve for the millions of newly unemployed workers.  German and English capital got millions of skilled immigrant workers at below labor market wages, and unimpeded access to markets and resources. The US secured NATO military bases, and recruited military forces for its Middle East and South Asian imperial wars.
US-German military and economic dominance in Europe was premised on retaining Russia as a weak quasi vassal state, and on the continued economic growth of their economies beyond the initial pillage of the ex-communist economies.
For the US, uncontested military supremacy throughout Europe was the springboard for near-time imperial expansion in the Middle East, South Asia, Africa and Latin America.  NATO was ‘internationalized’ into an offensive global military alliance: first in Somalia, Afghanistan then Iraq, Libya, Syria and the Ukraine.
The Rise of Russia, The Islamic Resistance and the New Cold War
During the ‘decade of infamy’ (1991-2000) extreme privatization measures by the client rulers in Russia on behalf of EU and US investors and gangster oligarchs, added up to vast pillage of the entire economy, public treasury and national patrimony.  The image and reality of a giant prostrate vassal state unable to pursue an independent foreign policy, and incapable of providing the minimum semblance of a modern functioning economy and maintaining the rule of law, became the defining view of Russia by the EU and the USA. Post-communist Russia, a failed state by any measure, was dubbed a “liberal democracy” by every western capitalist politician and so it was repeated by all their mass media acolytes.
The fortuitous rise of Vladimir Putin and the gradual replacement of some of the most egregious ‘sell-out’ neo-liberal officials, and most important, the reconstruction of the Russian state with a proper budget and functioning national institutions, was immediately perceived as a threat to US military supremacy and German economic expansion.  Russia’s transition from Western vassalage to regaining its status as a sovereign independent state set in motion, an aggressive counter-offensive by the US-EU. They financed a neo-liberal-oligarchy backed political opposition in an attempt to restore Russia to vassalage via street demonstrations and elections .Their efforts   to oust Putin and re-establish Western vassal state failed.  What worked in 19991 with Yeltsin’s power grab against Gorbachev was ineffective against Putin.  The vast majority of Russians did not want a return to the decade of infamy.
In the beginning of the new century, Putin and his team set new ground-rules, in which oligarchs could retain their illicit wealth and conglomerates, providing they didn’t use their economic levers to seize state power.  Secondly, Putin revived and restored the scientific technical, military, industrial and cultural institutions and centralized trade and investment decisions within a wide circle of public and private decision makers not beholden to Western policymakers.  Thirdly, he began to assess and rectify the breakdown of Russian security agencies particularly with regard to the threats emanating from Western sponsored ‘separatist’ movements in the Caucuses, especially, in Chechnya, and the onset of US backed ‘color revolutions’ in the Ukraine and Georgia.
At first, Putin optimistically assumed that, Russia being a capitalist state, and without any competing ideology, the normalization and stabilization of the Russian state would be welcomed by the US and the EU.  He even envisioned that they would accept Russia  as an economic, political, and even NATO partner.   Putin even made overtures to join and co-operate with NATO and the EU.  The West did not try to dissuade Putin of his illusions .In fact they encouraged him, even as they escalated their backing for Putin’s internal opposition and prepared a series of imperial wars and sanctions in the Middle East, targeting traditional Russian allies in Iraq, Syria and Libya.
As the ‘internal’ subversive strategy failed to dislodge President Putin, and the Russian state prevailed over the neo-vassals, the demonization of Putin became constant and shrill. The West moved decisively to an ‘outsider strategy’, to isolate, encircle and undermine the Russian state by undermining allies, and trading partners
US and Germany Confront Russia:  Manufacturing the “Russian Threat”
Russia was enticed to support US and NATO wars in Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya in exchange for the promise of deeper integration into Western markets.  The US and EU accepted Russian co-operation, including military supply routes and bases, for their invasion and occupation of Afghanistan.  The NATO powers secured Russian support of sanctions against Iran.  They exploited Russia’s naïve support of a “no fly zone” over Libya to launch a full scale aerial war.  The US financed  so-called “color revolutions” in Georgia and the Ukraine  overt, a dress rehearsal for the putsch in 2014  Each violent seizure of power allowed NATO to impose anti-Russian rulers eager and willing to serve as vassal states to Germany and the US.
Germany spearheaded the European imperial advance in the Balkans and  Moldavia, countries with strong economic ties to Russia.  High German officials “visited” the Balkans to bolster their ties with vassal regimes in Slovenia, Bulgaria, Slovakia and Croatia.  Under German direction, the European Union ordered  the vassal Bulgarian regime of Boyko “the booby” Borisov to block the passage of  Russian owned South Stream pipeline to Serbia, Hungary, Slovenia and beyond.  The Bulgarian state lost $400 million in annual revenue . . .  Germany and the US bankrolled pro-NATO and EU client politicians in Moldavia – securing the election of Iurie Leanca as Prime Minister.  As a result of Leanca’s slavish pursuit of EU vassalage, Moldavia lost $150 million in exports to Russia.  Leanca’s pro-EU policies go counter to the views of most Moldavians – 57% see Russia as the country’s most important economic partner.  Nearly 40% of the Moldavian working age population works in Russia and 25% of the Moldavians’ $8 billion GDP is accounted for by overseas remittances.
German and the US empire-builders steamroll over dissenting voices in Hungary, Serbia and Slovenia, as well as Moldova and Bulgaria, who’s economy and population suffer from the impositions of the blockade of  the Russian gas and oil pipeline.  But Germany’s, all out economic warfare against Russia takes precedent over the interests of its vassal states:  its theirs to sacrifice for the ‘Greater Good’ of the emerging German economic empire and the US – NATO military encirclement of Russia.  The extremely crude dictates of German imperial interests articulated through the EU, and the willingness of Balkan and Baltic regimes to sacrifice fundamental economic interests, are the best indicators of the emerging German empire in Europe.
Parallel to Germany’s rabid anti-Russian economic campaign, the US via NATO is engaged in a vast military build-up along the length and breadth of Russia’s frontier.  The US stooge, NATO Chief Jens Stoltenberg, boasts that over the current year, NATO has increased 5-fold the warplanes and bombers patrolling Russian maritime and land frontiers, carried out military exercises every two days and vastly increased the number of war ships in the Baltic and Black Sea.
Conclusion
What is absolutely clear is that the US and Germany want to return Russia to the vassalage status of the 1990’s.  They do not want ‘normal relations’. From the moment Putin moved to restore the Russian state and economy, the Western powers have engaged in a series of political and military interventions, eliminating Russian allies, trading partners and independent states.
The emergent of extremist, visceral anti-Russian regimes in Poland, Latvia, Estonia and Lithuania served as the forward shield for NATO advancement and German economic encroachment.  Hitler’s ‘dream’ of realizing the conquest of the East via unilateral military conquest has now under Prime Minister Merkel taken the form of conquest by stealth in Northern and Central Europe , by economic blackmail in the Balkans ,and by violent putsches in the Ukraine and  Georgia.
The German economic ruling class is divided between the dominant pro-US sector that is willing to sacrifice lucrative trade with Russia today in hopes of dominating and pillaging the entire economy in a post-Putin Russia (dominated by ‘reborn Yeltsin clones’); and a minority industrial sector, which wants to end sanctions and return to normal economic relations with Russia.
Germany is fearful that its client rulers in the East, especially in the Balkans are vulnerable to a popular upheaval due to the economic sacrifices they impose on the population.  Hence, Germany is wholly in favor of the new NATO rapid deployment force, ostensibly designed to counter a non-existent “Russian threat” but in reality to prop up faltering vassal regimes.
The ‘Russian Threat’, the ideology driving the US and German offensive throughout Europe and the Caucuses, is a replay of the same doctrine which Hitler used to secure support from domestic industrial bankers, conservatives and right wing overseas collaborators among extremists in Ukraine, Hungary, Rumania and Bulgaria.
The US-EU seizure of power via vassal political clients backed by corrupt oligarchs and Nazi street fighters in Ukraine detonated the current crisis. Ukraine power grab posed a top security threat to the very existence of Russia as an independent state.  After the Kiev take-over, NATO moved its stooge regime in Kiev forward to militarily eliminate the independent regions in the Southeast and seize the Crimea .thus totally eliminating Russia’s strategic position in the Black Sea. Russia the victim of the NATO power grab was labelled the “aggressor”. The entire officialdom and mass media echoed the Big Lie. Two decades of US NATO military advances on Russia’s borders and German-EU economic expansion into Russian markets were obfuscated.  Ukraine is the most important strategic military platform from which the US-NATO can launch an attack on the Russian heartland and the single largest market for Germany since the annexation of East Germany
The US and Germany see the Ukraine conquest as of extreme value in itself but also as the key to launching an all-out offensive to strangle Russia’s economy via sanctions and dumping oil and to militarily threaten Russia. The strategic goal is to reduce the Russian population to poverty and to re-activate the quasi-moribund opposition  to overthrow the Putin government and return Russia to permanent vassalage. The US and German imperial elite, looking beyond Russia, believe that if they control Russia, they can encircle ,isolate and attack China from the West as well as the East.
Wild-eyed fanatics they are not.  But as rabid proponents of a permanent war to end Russia’s presence in Europe and to undermine China’s emergence as a world power, they are willing to go to the brink of a nuclear war.
The ideological centerpiece of US-German imperial expansion and conquest in Europe and the Caucuses is the “Russian Threat”.  It is the touchstone defining adversaries and allies.  Countries that do not uphold sanctions are targeted.  The mass media repeat the lie.  The “Russian Threat” has become the war cry for cringing vassals – the phony justification for imposing frightful sacrifices to serve their imperial ‘padrones’ in Berlin and Washington –  fearing the rebellion of the ‘sacrificed’ population.  No doubt, under siege, Russia will be forced to make sacrifices.  The oligarchs will flee westward; the liberals will crawl under their beds.  But just as the Soviets turned the tide of war in Stalingrad, the Russian people, past the first two years of a bootstrap operation will survive, thrive and become once again a beacon of hope to all  people looking to get from under the tyranny of US-NATO militarism and German-EU economic dictates.
Fonte: http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-rise-of-german-imperialism-and-the-phony-russian-threat

CyberBerkut gained access to the documents of Joseph Biden’s delegation officials

We, CyberBerkut, have already warned against inadmissibility of the Washington's interference in internal affairs of our country. Moreover, we repeatedly claimed our rejection of Kiev authorities’ antinational policy which had put Ukraine in dependence from the USA.

During two-day visit of Joseph Biden to Kiev on November 20-21 we gained access to confidential files of the State Department that had been stored on American delegation member’s mobile device.

Today we are ready to acquaint Ukrainian citizens, the USA and the world community with the documents that uncover the real volume and direction of American aid to “settle” the Ukrainian crisis.

After examination of just a several files there is the impression that the Ukrainian army is the branch of US Armed Forces. The volume of US financial assistance amazes with its scale. They also show the highest level of degradation of the Ukrainian Armed Forces. Besides, thousands of dollars go on personal accounts of military personnel and used by certain officers in personal needs. What will the American taxpayers say?

Documents signed by Kiev and foreign authorities speak for themselves:

One of the most surprising documents. The Naval Command begs it's foreign masters to sponsor Ukrainian officers during military exercises headed by the Pentagon on the Ukraine territory. And what about national pride?
Besides, what's the point of transferring more than a half million UAH on a card account of LCDR Denis Stupak? It cannot be explained. Except for uncontrolled spending and enriching without paying taxes. Perhaps it would be very interesting for Ukrainian and American journalists to find this officer and ask him a couple of questions.

Here's another document concerning military exercises. This time the Army Academy Named After Hetman Petro Sagaydachnyi begs to recover exercise expenditure for meals and incidentals of its eleven officers and one civilian. They want up to 53,000 UAH.
And now attention! Why does the assignment allowance of Naval Forces officers come up to 1310 UAH per day, and assignment allowance of the Army Academy officers – 500 UAH per day? Are sailors hungrier? Or is it just blind cupidity?

This is one of the documents confirming that the Ukrainian army becomes a branch of US Armed Forces. The amount of expenses is amazing. What is much astonishing, almost one million dollars is assigned for opening "linguistic laboratories" and purchasing text-books for them. Undoubtedly, it is what Ukrainian Armed Forces need today. They all need English to understand Washington's orders more quickly.

This document contains signatures of Barak Obama and John Kerry. The USA will provide Ukrainian Armed Forces with counter-mortar radars. It is what Mr. Poroshenko proudly talked about. So it happened. Three radars worth a total of $400 000. It's a penny in comparison with what Ukrainian army will receive from Washington. From these documents it's not difficult to understand that US military assistance calculates in millions of dollars. And as we all know, he who pays the piper calls the tune.

The United States of America continue to assert that they are ready to provide Ukraine only with non-lethal commodities. But for some reasons members of Joseph Biden’s delegation have been given the document with the mark “for the Congress, final”. After reading of this document it’s getting clear that the junta is not going to comply with the Minsk agreements and observe the truce. They are ready to kill again!
400 sniper-rifles, 2000 assault-rifles, 720 hand-held grenade launchers, 200 mortars with more than 70 000 mines, 150 stingers, 420 antitank missiles and so on. That’s the plan of a peaceful settlement of the conflict in the South-East by Petro Poroshenko.

For some reason, special attention is paid to Ukraine’s Naval Forces. On one hand it’s clear that there are no Naval Forces in Ukraine. On the other hand it points at aggressive plans of the USA and Kiev to prepare subversive operations not only in the South-East, but in Crimea. It’s hard to find another explanation. Otherwise, for what purpose does Ukraine need 150 combat divers?

Fonte:http://cyber-berkut.org/en/