Syria is the Middle Eastern Stalingrad

Day and night, for years, an overwhelming force has been battering this quiet nation, one of the cradles of human civilization.

Hundreds of thousands have died, and millions have been forced to flee abroad or have been internally displaced. In many cities and villages, not one house is left intact.

But Syria is, against all odds, still standing.

During the last 3 years I worked in almost all of Syria’s perimeters, exposing the birth of ISIS in the NATO-run camps built in Turkey and Jordan. I worked in the occupied Golan Heights, and in Iraq. I also worked in Lebanon, a country now forced to host over 2 million (mostly Syrian) refugees.

The only reason why the West began its horrible destabilization campaign, was because it “could not tolerate” Syria’s disobedience and the socialist nature of its state. In short, the way the Syrian establishment was putting the welfare of its people above the interests of multi-national corporations.

*

More than two years ago, my former Indonesian film editor demanded an answer in a somewhat angry tone:

“So many people are dying in Syria! Is it really worth it? Wouldn’t it be easier and better for Syrians to just give up and let the US have what it is demanding?”

Chronically petrified, this young woman was always searching for easy solutions that would keep her safe, and safe with significant personal advantages. As so many others in this time and age, in order to survive and advance, she developed a complex system resting on betrayals, self-defenses and deceptions.

How to reply to such a question?

It was a legitimate one, after all.

Eduardo Galeano told me: “People know when it’s time to fight. We have no right to tell them … but when they decide, it is our obligation to support them, even to lead them if they approach us.”

In this case, the Syrian people decided. No government, no political force could move an entire nation to such tremendous heroism and sacrifice. Russians did it during World War Two, and the Syrians are doing it now.

Two years ago I replied like this: “I have witnessed the total collapse of the Middle East. There was nothing standing there anymore. Countries that opted for their own paths were literally leveled to the ground. Countries that succumbed to the dictates of the West lost their soul, culture and essence and were turned into some of the most miserable places on earth. And the Syrians knew it: were they to surrender, they would be converted into another Iraq, Yemen or Libya, even Afghanistan.”

And so Syria rose. It decided to fight, for itself and for its part of the world.

Again and again, it retained itself through the elections of its government. It leaned on its army. Whatever the West says, whatever the treasonous NGOs write, the simple logic just proves it all.

This modest nation does not have its own powerful media to share the extent of its courage and agony with the world. It is always the others who are commenting on its struggle, often in a totally malicious way.

But it is undeniable that whilst the Soviet forces stopped the advance of the German Nazis at Stalingrad, the Syrians have managed to stop the fascist forces of Western allies in its part of the world.

Of course Russia got directly involved. Of course China stood by, although often in the shadow. And Iran provided support. And Lebanon-based Hezbollah put up, what I often describe as, an epic fight on behalf of Damascus against the extremist monsters invented and armed by the West, Turkey and Saudi Arabia.

But the main credit has to go to the Syrian people.

Yes, now there is nothing left of the Middle East. Now there are more tears than raindrops descending on this ancient land.

But Syria is standing. Burned, wounded, but standing.

And as is being widely reported, after the Russian armed forces came to the rescue of the Syrian nation, more than 1 million Syrian people were able to return home … often to encounter only ashes and devastation, but home.

Like people returned to Stalingrad, some 70 years ago.

*

So what would my answer be to that question now: “whether it would be easier the other way”, to surrender to the Empire?

I guess something like this:

“Life has meaning, it is worth living, only if some basic conditions can be fulfilled. One does not betray great love, be it love for another person or love for one’s country, humanity or ideals. If one does, it would be better not to be born at all. Then I say: the survival of humankind is the most sacred goal. Not some short-time personal gain or ‘safety’, but the survival of all of us, of people, as well as the safety of all of us, humans.”

When life itself is threatened, people tend to rise and fight, instinctively. During such moments, some of the most monumental chapters in human history are written.

Unfortunately, during these moments, millions tend to die.

But the devastation is not because of those who are defending our human race.

It is because of the imperialist monsters and their servants.

Most of us are dreaming about a world without wars, without violence. We want true kindness to prevail on earth. Many of us are working relentlessly for such a society.

But until it is constructed, until all extreme selfishness, greed and brutality are defeated, we have to fight for something much more “modest” – for the survival of people and of humanism.

The price is often horrible. But the alternative is one enormous gaping void. It is simply nothing – the end, full stop!

In Stalingrad, millions died so we could live. Nothing was left of the city, except some melted steel, scattered bricks and an ocean of corpses. Nazism was stopped. Western expansionism began its retreat, that time towards Berlin.

Now Syria, quietly but stoically and heroically, stands against Western, Qatari, Saudi, Israeli and Turkish plans to finish the Middle East.

And the Syrian people have won. For how long, I don’t know. But it has proven that an Arab country can still defeat the mightiest murderous hordes.

Andre Vltchek is philosopher, novelist, filmmaker and investigative journalist, he’s a creator of Vltchek’s World an a dedicated Twitter user, especially for the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook”.
First appeared: http://journal-neo.org/2016/01/02/syria-is-the-middle-eastern-stalingrad/

All western states united in supporting the invasion of Yemen by Saudi Arabia

Saudi Arabia and the Gulf countries began military operations in Yemen, the Saudi air force began bombing the position of the movement Ansarullah in the capital of the country, according to information broadcast by Al-Arabiya.The operation started after the statement issued by the Council of the Gulf countries that have decided to intervene militarily in support of the request made by the President (ousted by popular uprising), Abd Rabbuh Mansur Had, to restore the government of these. This is a real invasion of the neighboring country implemented by Saudi forces. See: Sputnik News
The United States, through their diplomatic representative, have declared their full support for the operation and also added the representative of the US, Washington is also committed to providing logistical support and intelligence to Saudi forces. US bases in Golo were mobilized for the occasion. So will the UK in accordance with agreements with the government in Riyadh.Note: this time we will talk about what the military spokesman Atlanticist, through the media controlled by them: perhaps intervening to protect "human rights"?What,: those trampled by the fierce absolutist regime of Monarchy of Saud supported by the US and the UK?Can explain many topics that the 'invasion of a foreign country (Yemen) becomes "legitimate" if they are in the interests of the Saudi state game and the Western powers?
Ansarullah ", Yemen
The facts are these: Yemen (Arabian Peninsula), the Yemeni population had risen a few weeks ago against the dictatorship (inspired by the Saudis) and, thanks to the thrust of the movement "Ansarullah", a heterogeneous formation of Shiite Houthi tribe but also of tribes Sunni, who struggled against an absolutist regime and the freedom-president, dictator Mansour Hadi, who currently and 'refugee in Aden. The Houthis, who earlier appeared militarily weak, the strong support of the population, have taken over and have also conquered the capital Sanaa.This revolution with the overthrow of a dictatorial regime, do not define an "Arab spring" by the West because this time there are at stake the interests of Saudi Arabia, the great ally of the US, Britain and France, and as a result is defines a change of government "illegitimate" because it is overthrown (coincidentally) a regime controlled by the Saudi monarchy, an ally of the Western powers. Actually you suspect that behind the movement of Ansarullah there is the support of Iran, first Shia power and great enemy of Israel and the USA and this just because it forms a "international coalition" to return the despot, deposed by an uprising popular in the government building of Sana.
Here then explained briefly the interest of the US and its allies to support the Saudis and provide any assistance requested military. Of course this time can not ammorbarci with the usual spiel propaganda of the need to "export democracy", as it would be a little hard to get that, that under the House of Saud, is something that vaguely resembles a "democracy" rather than not an absolutist regime and barbaric.
Sunni formations that supported the regime, supported by Ryad, are those who are guilty of the worst crimes such as the latest attack on Shiite mosques took place on Friday in which, due to the explosive placed in mosques have killed about 150 people helpless who attended religious services.
It just so happens that it is precisely the Saudi Monarchy (along with Qatar and Turkey), the country that inspired and supported terrorism takfiris that haunts the Middle East and that is infiltrating even in Europe among Muslim communities. But this media system Atlanticist not say indeed, support the blatant lie that, with the rise of Ansarullah Yemen, this would encourage terrorism.
Exactly the opposite of reality as are the Shiite formations in Syria, Iraq and Lebanon (Hezbollah and the Syrian Army) with the support of Iran, those who are fighting on the ground the army of the Islamic state, and certainly not the international coalition bombing from above and at the same time provides the weapons and supplies to the groups of ISIS in Iraq as in Syria (as documented).
Hence the Atlanticist media (TV and newspapers) are placed on trial, a new campaign of disinformation and lies to criminalize those who have rebelled against a despotic regime and to justify this time a real military intervention of the Saudis in a neighboring country.
In the sordid war exists in the Arab world between Sunnis, Shiites and Wahhabis, the West has made his choice, and, for their own interests, sided anywhere with the Sunnis and the Wahhabis of Islamic radicalism, those who are at war against Shiite populations, war fueled precisely by the Saudis who aspire to leaderschip the Muslim world. Not for nothing were killed or thwarted by Western intervention all were secular and nationalist radicalism which contrasted Sunni and Wahhabi inspired by Monarchy Ryad (Saddam Hussein in Iraq, Gaddafi in Libya, Assad in Syria).
On the other hand the business relations of the Americans, British and French with the Saudis and with Qatar are too strong and too intense to be able just to mention a few cracks. It is they who have and Westerners adapt. Not for nothing are the countries that invest their capital in the West, finance friendly governments and fund mosques and Sunni Muslim communities in Europe. Of this in a matter of if they were aware.
We know that military interventions can be "legitimate" for the West when they are suited to the interests of the US and its closest allies in the Middle East: the sheiks and the absolutist monarchs of Saudi Arabia do not touch, sit on mountains of petrodollars and they are always right and there are no "human rights" that take.
Translated by google
fonte: http://url.ie/yxjy